Washington's impact on Silicon Valley

This is essential reading by Michael Malone. (WSJ - December 21, 2008) . http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122990472028925207.html

Interview with Yinlang Tan (Harvard University (Adjunct Faculty, Singapore Management University)

The Models of Asian VCs

1) Why did you become a VC?

I had lots of ideas for different businesses, and wanted to pursue all of them, but I knew there was not enough time in the day to do it all. Venture capital allowed me that flexibility. I don't run any of the companies, but I get to work with them and create with them. Also, my father was a VC, and so was my grandfather.

2) Of the successful VCs I have met, there are 3 broad models:
- "Govt-turned-VC" model
- "The Apprentice" model
- "Ex-CEO/Winner" model
Which model do you belong to?

I am "son of VC model"
(Please suggest other models not included) Which do you feel is the most likely to succeed? The one who is the most determined to fight for the entrepreneur.

3) What is the nature of the apprenticeship?
People learn by doing.

4) What do you have to learn?
I don't know. I have been at this for over 20 years and I still don't have the answer for you.

5) How do you get to the point where you can actually get LP's to invest in you, and so on?
For individuals, it is generally by convincing them that you will be successful, you will help create great businesses, you will build great value, employ large numbers of people, and make them a lot of money.

For institutions, it is all about the track record. You have to have invested successfully before. You need to look like an institution before institutions will want to invest with you. They are fiduciaries and have responsibilities to their beneficiaries, not to mention potential liability.

How Asian VCs make money - the math of venture capital

6) Is it just speculating on the bubble or is there more to it than that?
VC makes money because large companies don't have all the answers. In fact, most large companies are risk averse, which allows small companies to jump in and try new things. I also believe that entrepreneurs and the teams they build have more energy and put more effort into their jobs than employees of big companies. So more value is created there.

7) Is Asian VC just like Silicon Valley VC and if not, are the differences a reflection of immaturity(some day China vc will be just like SV VC) or factors unique to China that will persist?
Originally, we thought they would be different, but it turns out that great entrepreneurs are great no matter where they come from. China's rise is important, as is the low cost of labor there. But I think the entrepreneurs are amazing everywhere.

For example, VC in the west usually funds tech, but in China VCs cover a broader range of sectors. I like that about China. Open to anything. Cool things are going to happen there.

8) How do you choose the right people to syndicate with?
I usually syndicate with people who work with great venture capital firms or people with great enthusiasm for the business and great knowledge of the industry the business is pursuing.

9) What are the 3 most common mistakes VC make?
- Not investing when they see passion.
- Group think.
- Not building as big a network as they possibly can.

10) What did you learn from your mistakes?
I haven't.

What LPs are looking for in Asian VCs?
I am a GP. As an LP, I would be looking for energy, a good personal local network, a link to the DFJ Network, and, if possible, a good track record.

11) Also who are the LP's and how do you persuade them to invest part of their assets in VC at all?
I believe now is the best time in my work lifetime to invest in a VC fund. Many of the greatest companies in the world have been created during depressions and recessions. Exxon, Chevron, GE, Lilly, Microsoft, Baidu, and Skype were all started during recessions or depressions. And for venture capitalists, the valuations, and cost of labor, real estate and materials are lower, so returns can be even higher.

How to go from where you are to where you want to be in the 21th century?

12) Is B-school necessary?

No. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison didn't go to business school. Some even dropped out of college.

For VC, I think business school is helpful. The broad base of knowledge and the network are both valuable.

Which B-School should you go to (HBS/Stanford/INSEAD?) to maximize your chances?

Your network is important if you want to be a VC. I would choose according to the network you want to build. Maybe it is ISB or a top Chinese Business School.

I'm specifically wondering why a VC firm would want to hire a recent grad, and how a recent grad can make his/her skills applicable to what a VC needs?
It usually takes about 6 months for a new analyst or associate to get up to speed on our business. After that, they are quite valuable. They generate new leads, and add to our network. They allow us to leverage
them to make great progress. They make for a more dynamic workplace. Lots of things.

13) Smart networking
Is starting early necessary? If so, how? Yes.
Should a VC be getting out to places like Chengdu, not just Shanghai?
Yes.

How do you network with other VC's?

I go to and sometimes arrange meetings, conferences, etc. Both informal and formal gatherings are
good.

14) Building your track record and reputation
What are the skills that really matter and how do you develop them?
No special skills, but specific emotions. You have to love (or get a kick out of) entrepreneurs.

Crisis or Opportunity?

A different perspective on the doom and gloom in the financial markets from the "AlwaysOn Venture Summit".
http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/30370

Insights on the Recession and Broken IPO Market

Check out these great articles:

Encourage the Rebels; Economic growth will depend on innovative entrepreneurs, not incumbent corporations
Vinod Khosla, Newsweek
http://www.newsweek.com/id/171909



Reopening the IPO Window
Joseph Bartlett, Science Progress

http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/01/reopening-the-ipo-window/

Some highlights of the article include:
"As recently as 1996, the average deal size of a Nasdaq IPO was $34 million, and the average market capitalization was $133 million. Ten years later, the average IPO deal size was $113 million, and the average market cap was over $330 million—a size that only a much bigger company can sustain."

"But consider this: When Intel went public in 1970, it offered $8 million of stock and sported a market value of $53 million. Cisco Systems Inc.’s IPO in 1990 raised only $50 million, at a price which yielded a post-deal market cap at IPO of $226 million."

"The evidence suggests that we are now killing our most promising companies, our future “national champions,” before their time. Does anyone seriously believe Cisco would have grown more if it had been acquired by Digital Equipment, or that Microsoft would have thrived inside IBM?"

The Hug Spree at the YouTube Live Event

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVXNn0hoGZg

Thank you from BizWorld

Always On Venture Summit (December 2-3, 2008)

Venture Summit is a must-attend event for entrepreneurs or investors in the growth technology and greentech markets. You will get the inside scoop from the smartest investors, and meet Silicon Valley’s finest private companies. I wouldn’t miss it!

DFJ is able to extend a 50% discount to friends of DFJ.

http://alwayson.goingon.com/cart/add/29899

Repeal Sarbox

Check out Newt Gingrich's article on repealing Sarbanes-Oxley:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/05/ED2813T8O9.DTL

A VC's View on Regulation

I am optimistic about our new president and the healing he can bring to the country. Economically, he has a great opportunity to be a hero. I would suggest he call an end to the bailouts and as soon as possible sell the government interests back to the private sector. He faces a structural liquidity problem with too much regulation. Sarbox should be eliminated entirely. It doesn't even do what it set out to do. How did it help us gauge the banks for instance? FASB has run its course and should be eliminated in favor of the international alternative. Mark to market is a disaster that shows FASB to be out of touch. That said, this is the time the true entrepreneurs show their awesome creativity, and I expect to see some greatness coming soon. And if we get rid of SARBOX, we can take them public so everyone can share in their success.